Justice Thomas “Hardly Be(ing) Reasonable”

Type: Column (published by JURIST)
Date: June 26, 2014
Summary: This legal commentary, authored by Project ISD’s Ryan Seelau, examines Justice Thomas’ dissent in the Michigan v Bay Mills Indian Community Supreme Court case. The column argues that Justice Thomas is willing to go to great lengths–including disregarding Supreme Court precedent–in order to attack the doctrine of tribal sovereign immunity.
Download: PDF